About Me

Name: The Gunny
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

OUR GOVERNMENT IS DERELICT IN IT'S DUTY

 

When and where are we going to be able earn the money it takes to sustain economic growth? That is the burning question. Meanwhile, the Feds are printing billions of dollars. But printed money can only serve to temporarily prop up a failing economy while it devalues the money earned through honest labor.  Inevitably, the result will be inflation, which is far more devastating than a recession or a depression. As an example I will use Southern Rhodesia's recent  fall from 300+ years of prosperity. The disaster was caused by socialist who decided that white farmers were too rich. They killed some and chased the others out of  their country. It's now known as Zimbabwe, a poor starving country where,  in a few short years, a thousand of their dollars can't buy what one dollar could buy before they ousted the rich white farmers.

We are headed down the same sorry road. The con-job the government is handing us is criminal in its negligence of the public trust. They are printing money to keep up the appearance that we are still a prosperous society. It’s all a sham. The rich are being demonized and their businesses are being taken over by a pettty tyrant for the good of society. More and more goods are being produced in third-world countries while our government encourages us to spend more and more money on foriegn commodities. In fact, they send us checks in the mail so we’ll have money to spend.

Spending unearned money is like spending monopoly money because we aren’t earning it by working at jobs. It goes out of one government pocket into another. Because, it creates no wealth nor growth in business, it will eventually be useful only as toilet paper. To make matters worse, the earned money we spend on goods made in China and elsewhere doesn’t stay in this country. That money can’t be re-circulated through our banks to be available as loans, to build homes, start up new businesses, and to purchase inventory.

In trying to make lemonade out of lemons, the present administration tells us that a weak U.S. dollar is good for exports. “Our goods will be cheaper overseas,” they tell us. There’s only one problem with that theory: businesses can’t afford to produce the goods necessary to take advantage of this windfall. Meanwhile, the money that was supposed to stimulate businesses has disappeared down a rat hole.

We can’t produce the goods in America because it costs too much to manufacture them. Between unions, taxes, minimum wage, and mandated health care, employers can’t realize the profits necessary to reinvest in capital, nor can they entice wary shareholders to invest in them. It's all basic economics 101 stuff, but this administration thinks it’s illogical and they are convinced that capitalism exploits the worker. They don’t understand that in American capitalism, the employer/employee relationship is a mutually beneficial activity. Liberals are stuck in the 1900’s when Marx and Lenin correctly described the exploitive labor situation in Europe at the start of the Industrial Revolution. Those horrible conditions do not exist in America and if they did, we wouldn’t need the government to correct the situation. Labor can take care of itself without government backed unions. When unions (such as those that exist in America today) have the full force of the government behind them, it’s the same as being forced at gun-point to do their wishes. This mutually beneficial arrangement between socialist thugs and union thugs has crippled businesses. It’s the origin of the phrase “Socialist Union” as in USSR.

If we continue to destroy the environment that produces risk takers, entrepreneurs, and innovators, and if we continue to allow the ongoing corruption resulting in vanishing billions, we will be no better off than any banana republic. Individualism and liberties will be stripped from us because those are concepts that tyranny cannot abide.

Meanwhile, we impotently watch China replicate the capitalist system that we once enjoyed. We marvel at the exploding economic power they have produced in a few short years. We shake our heads as we learn that China has chastised our president and given him lectures on how to cut spending, reduce taxes, and to allow businesses to flourish and expand. We truly are a sorry country let by a sorry president elected by a sorry society. We no longer have the capability to earn enough money to live as free people without interference from a heavy-handed government. We are about to experience what “equality” is all about. Welcome to the world of communism where the misery is spread equally among all except those in the inner circle of the politburo in Washington, D.C.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Waiting for an Afghan Tet-like Offensive?

 

President Obama, you are purposely tying the hands of your generals in the fight against terrorism. If that’s your policy, then go public with it and stop dithering and stalling like a simpering wimp. You have made your feelings about war public with your statement that, “…the idea of victory makes me uneasy.” You go on to relate how the pictures of the Japanese surrendering on the USS Missouri made you feel sorry for the Japanese. This sends a clear mandate to the terrorists that you do not intend to fight them to any conclusive victory. I must conclude by your inaction that you do not intend to fulfill your earlier promises to us and to your generals. You also do not intend to honor your oath to protect our troops if you can so casually stand by and let your generals twist in the wind. This is no time to be whistling past the graveyard, Ms. Obama. Your speeches are empty promises. You keep telling us that you’re working hard on the problem, that your “people” are all over it, yet days turn into weeks that turn into months, etc. and no decisions are forthcoming.

As Rush Limbaugh often says, “Hope is for losers.” It’s action that gets things done. Appeasing our enemies and hoping they will become reasonable and lay down their arms is wishful thinking, Ms. Obama. We’ve been there before with these animals in Iran. Remember Ms. Carter? He/she also acted like a closet queen and tried to appease Muslim terrorists. They responded by taking the entire American Embassy as hostages. For over a year, Ms. Carter was unable to persuade the man, who is now president of Iran, to release them. It took the election of Mr. Ronald Reagan to immediately change his mind, because he knew Reagan would actually do something to get the hostages back, and it wouldn’t be to play patty-cake for months on end.

Inaction in war is a sure recipe for disaster. Don’t assume that the enemy is sitting around their hookahs waiting for us to make a move. They are planning their attacks this very minute; laying out new strategies based on our inaction, and anyone with a brain larger than a peanut knows that a major Tet-like attack is imminent.

Would anyone care to wager a bet that Obama is playing this waiting game secretly hoping that a large body count will upset the American public and give him just cause to pull the troops out of the Middle East, thereby handing his Muslim friends the victory they’ve been looking for, and making his liberal fringe friends happy?

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wake Up America!

 
Sharia Law and the Constitution

The MSM is showing us a lot of positive propaganda about Islam in America lately. Many Americans still do not understand or believe that Barak Hussein Obama (Not his real name) is a Muslim. When “The One” gave the commencement speech at Notre Dame and insisted that all Christian symbols be removed from his presence, why didn’t all of America stand up and protest? It should be evident, that when a president celebrates Muslim holy days in the White House, but refuses to acknowledge Christian or Jewish holy days, something is fishy.

I have no idea how to convince the Obama cultists that they are nothing more than pawns in his power game. He is poised to become president of the world under one religion—Islam. Liberals think that a one-world government will solve all of society’s problems and the world will live in peace for ever more. They believe we will be liberated from those old rustic Western World values and will be free from having to comply with out-dated morals that no longer apply to the modern world. The dimwits don’t realize that under Sharia law they will lose any and all freedoms and rights that they ever thought of having. They fail to understand that they will either convert, become Muslim slaves, or they will all be killed. Liberal demonstrations in the streets will end in liberal bloodshed.

How in heaven’s name can we Americans, who still value our freedoms and our Judeo-Christian ethics, convince our own leaders that Islam is an evil leading us into the darkest of dark ages? I hear Bush, Clinton,Carter, and Blair claim that Islam is a peaceful religion and that we are not at war with Islam, just the terrorists. According to major Islam clerics, Bin Laden is not a strict follower of the Q’ran, he is basically a terrorist. “He is not one of us.” Well, Bush, Clinton, Tony Blair and all other dimwits who call themselves liberal or conservative progressives can swallow that nonsense if they want, but I’m not buying it for one minute.  Since I have never once heard a Muslim cleric, or a Muslim professor, or any other of their leaders condemn the 9/11 attacks, I can only surmise that Bin Laden is a Muslim and Muslims worldwide condone and support this heinous act.

How does pointing that out make me a hate-monger, or a racist? 

Liberals, either in their ignorance of Western civilization or their desire to ignore it or in their rush to be “different”, are going to lead us right into the maw of Islam. By not acknowledging that the only true rights we human beings have are certain unalienable rights given to us by our creator, and by failing to believe those rights cannot be taken away by any man or any government, they have opened themselves and the reset of us to the devil’s own invention -- Islam. They are willing to tolerate Muslims and give them “rights” that are not afforded to others.  The dimwits will be absorbed into Islam, at first because it’s “neat” and “different,” and it would be so cool to defy the Christian right wing nuts, and then it’ll be too late, because, like the Mafia, once you’re in, you can’t get out on pain of death.

Under Sharia law, separation of state and religion, one of the main tenants of the liberal religion, will be a thing of the past. It already is to a certain extent.  In some of our schools, Muslims have the “right” to pray, to wear symbols of their religion (head scarves for now, burkas later) in the classrooms, and the right to separate classrooms for girls, etc. Liberals, rather than make an “issue” out of it, give in to their demands one after another. Europe is now paying the price for their liberal tolerance of Muslims. Obviously, our own liberal dimwits don’t watch the news or they would be able to figure out what’s coming next.

By ignoring our constitution, and especially the first ten amendments, we have caused our own downfall. The main problem, I believe, is in the arena of rights. As I mentioned before, the only true rights we have are those self-evident rights given to us by our Creator. The right to live free and to pursue happiness is not a new concept. It was first expressed in the Magna Carta when the King’s Barons demanded certain land rights under threat of civil war. It was a short step from there to natural individual rights as derived from our Creator and not from a King or any other body of politics.

Liberal politics have insisted that certain groups have rights bestowed upon them by the government to the exclusion of other groups. Tension and dissention is the grand result. Those who have rights given to them by government must realize that sooner or later, those rights can be taken away, and they will not be able to contest it either.  The government assigns rights to those who can give them the most power in return.  As soon as the Muslims have enough power to vie for more privileges and rights, they will be given them in return for money and influence (power). Europe is fast approaching the point where there are more Muslims than native Europeans assuming leadership and power that will soon overwhelm the Western world.

We must take our country back now if it is not already too late. Once the various factions competing for rights get into a feeding frenzy, it will be impossible to stop it. The year 2010 is the defining year; the year we either lose our country for good or take it back to start the struggle all over again. We must insist that Muslims have no “rights” over everyone else in this country and enforce our own Bill of Rights so that no one group has rights over those of individuals.

Ignoring the Constitution and its amendments is a sure formula for the collapse of America as a super power, as a beacon of freedom, and as a haven for the world’s downtrodden. When we consider the constitution as nothing more than an outdated piece of paper that has outlived its purpose and time, we can say goodbye to prosperity and happiness for our families, and while we're at it, say goodbye to freedom and liberty. Now is the time to say hello to government housing, government transportation, government health care, government education, government groceries and other retail stores.  Let's say hello to government indoctrination that will tell us that what is good for society is good for the individual, and let's get familiar with the government constantly bombarding us with "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."  In other words, Hello Union of Soviet Socialists of America.

People say that I am a radical conservative. Bull! America needs to wake up to the fact that we are facing our own extinction if we do nothing but sit on our hands.  If nothing else, we should remember that the pen is mightier than the sword. Write to your local and federal Senators and Representatives. It’s so easy to do. Simply google in this fashion: “(State) Senators” or (State) Representatives. From there you simply click on  "email your Senator” and fill in the email information along with your comments. Don’t forget the phones. Keep these people’s feet to the fire, constantly. Don’t let them relax into thinking they are not our servants. Tell them you are disgusted and fed up with Washington D.C. and you want them to put a stop to the out of control spending and taxing. Remind them that you are watching their every vote in Congress (Also easy to do with google). Simply ask for your Senator’s voting record or how they voted on a particular bill. Take advantage of the information we have at our fingertips while we still have the freedom to do so. Take back our Constition and our God-given rights. Don't sit and wring your hands thinking there is nothing you can do. The worse thing you can do is nothing!







 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHY MARXISM IS WRONG FOR AMERICA

 
 

WHY MARXISM IS WRONG FOR AMERICA

 

Observing Obama these last few months is like watching a slo-mo movie of a train wreck in progress. His attempt to force a free people into a socialist steam kettle will fail.  The mounting pressure will explode when he tries to cram his health care system down our throats.  Liberals, deluded into thinking that all people yearn to have equal social and economic status, believe that their fellow Americans have the same thoughts.  While once true of Europeans under the yoke of the aristocracy — that harboring dreams of social and economic equality were futile — Americans have no aristocracy holding them down.

In those bad old days, if not born a blue blood, you would never know any other life than that of a serf, not worthy of more than a swift kick if you did not move out of the way.  As a commoner, you had no hope of improving your station in life. The aristocracy, far removed from the problems of having to earn a living, or even having to do anything for themselves, gave little or no thought to the poor.  With their elevated social status never open to question, they could literally get away with murder.  Under these awful conditions, Marx’s theory of class envy would hold water.  In that day and age, it would be easy to see how his ideas would catch on.  But in America, his ideas of one class lording it over another does not apply.

It’s true that we have an upper class “royalty” in America, but one that we have created for ourselves and, for a time, unique only to us.  Now the rest of the world has its own upper class of “royalty” with their rock stars, movie stars, certain politicians, and sports heroes.  It’s a pseudo-society that moves in its own orbits and has its own particular set of demons to deal with.  However, one social slip-up (drug use, adultery, drunkenness), and all status of “royalty” is stripped away.  Conversely, with the European and Middle Eastern upper crust, debauchery rules. In America, you can lose your upper crust status, but not so for most of the world.  All the more reason why I insist that Marxism has no place in American society.

And then we have the old-time “Robber Barons” like Vanderbilt, Astor, Carnegie, and Cooke.

The term “Robber Barons”, coined during the Great Depression, referred to highly successful industrialists and bankers who may or may not have used questionable methods to get rich.  Liberals demonized successful businessmen during past hard economic times, just as they delight in demonizing them today.  In the 1920’s and 30’s the rich didn’t mind open displays of wealth, however, since the Great Depression, the very rich have made it a point to subdue any display of their good fortune.  Bill Gates, a very successful businessman, and considered a “Robber Baron” by some of his less successful competitors, does not flaunt his wealth in public; in fact, his generosity and support of many worthy causes gives more actual aid and comfort to the poor than all government programs combined.

You will notice, by contrast, that rich liberal politicians hold on tight to their purse strings, and give, by way of comparison, small change to charities.  And then we have people like Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama who actually enjoy flaunting their exalted positions and their obvious wealth in the public’s face.  Google any of the rich liberals names for their charitable donations.  I’m not pointing fingers, just making an objective, documented observation that rich, ill-mannered liberal politicians exhibit undesirable low-class traits.   As examples of their excesses I refer to Pelosi’s private 757 airliner for her exclusive use for her weekly commutes to her home in California (imagine that carbon footprint), and to the recent obscene European shopping spree of the Obama’s.  Google “Michelle’s sneakers” to check out her $540.00 shoes.  Google “Nancy Pelosi Jet.”  Google “Obamas Shopping in Europe.”

Marx detested the very same values that contemporary rich liberal politicians delight in.  Obama uses Marxism as a way to create false class envy, to pit one class against another, to wrest power from the present government (of, by, and for the people), and to create his own Utopian kingdom where he alone dictates to the people of his domain.  He has the ability to do it too. 

America is the land of the free, and the home of the brave; the land where personal initiative and the freedom to put your ideas to the test makes life worth living.  If you fail the first time, you pick yourself up and you figure out what went wrong, and you bravely try again.  If you want to dream big, nobody can hold you down. Obama is a prime example of that truism.  Yet we teeter on the brink of losing it all by allowing ourselves the luxury of staying home on election days.  We cannot afford to let those who prefer government dominion over their lives to vote away our unalienable, God-given rights and freedoms.  We are an endangered species and nobody will save us but ourselves.

It simply takes the majority of Americans (and illegals) to vote themselves a government that gives them everything for free and eliminates personal responsibility.  When they accomplish this goal, then Obama will have your souls, your minds, and your bodies to do with as he pleases.  God help us when the inevitable revolution explodes.

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Exports Fundamental Islam to Palau and Bermuda

Those who are scratching their heads trying to figure out why Obama sent the Muslim terrorists to the those small islands in the Carribean (Burmuda) and the Pacific(Palau ) only have to remember...he is a Muslim (contrary to his denials), and the spread of Islam is paramount.  What better way to spread a terrorist movement than to salt dedicated Al Qaida warriors to these innocent tourist attractions.  Boy, I can't believe the audacity of this guy.  He can do the most blatant, in-your-face things right under our noses, then turn his back and crack up laughing while we stand around like deer caught in the brilliance of his aura.
 
I see the pictures of these scum bags on the beach; smiling, fishing, and eating ice-cream like they were gay American tourists without a care.  My I can't believe this alarm goes off  --  aaaaaaaahh! Then I have to wonder, who is footing the bill for these scum bags, and at what annual price per bag? For life?  What a beautiful retirement plan!  Good job Obama!  You've sent and are paying for college level professors to teach grade school level children how to be good Muslim Al Qaida terrorists.  How pleased Osama Bin Laden must be.  It's like letting people with SARS enter an orphanage and then rejoicing when the whole orphanage falls ill and dies.  All I know, I'm so damned mad my jaws ache.   What kind of empty-headed, self-righteous, clueless person does it take to vote for and follow a phony snakeoil salesman like Obama?  I'm serious...what kind of idiot does that?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT ARE ALL THOSE ISMs ANYWAY?

WHAT ARE ALL THOSE ISMs ANYWAY?

                                                                                              PART I

 

I have to chuckle whenever I see liberals use the word neocon.  Actually, the neocons are the old liberals — our founding fathers.  They were the folks who believed that individuals are more important than the dumb masses (yes, you’re reading the last two words correctly).   Seventy years ago the word “liberalism” was hijacked and used as a cover for Marxist communism.   It is no wonder that today’s conservatives feel insecure what with socialism, communism, fascism and Marxism, under one umbrella called liberalism, is competing for the hearts and minds of the American people…and winning.

With all these isms flying around, I decided to look into them in order to understand the differences.  Most of these definitions are from a college text book someone gave me back in the 80’s.

Socialism, communism, fascism, and Marxism are similar to each other, but there are some important differences.  Let’s look at the two ways in which they are alike.   First, all four deal with an economic system in which the mode of production of goods and services are controlled by the government.  Second, they all believe that the self-serving individual is evil and society should be self-sacrificing.  People should serve each other for the greater good.  In all of these societies, the individual cannot be allowed to exist in isolation from the others.  Individuals and community are considered to be one unit. The differences between these  forms of government have to do with how the combined individual slash community interrelates with the social/economic/political environment.

Socialism:  Since the days of Franklin D. Roosevelt, we find ourselves living in an increasingly socialistic America.  Republicans and Democrats alike have moved toward socialism.  We still have individuals who own their own businesses creating needed goods and services, and providing jobs to those who would trade their labor for wages, but this is soon going to be a thing of the past.  It would seem that full-blown socialism is the new zeitgeist of our society.  In a socialist society the primary concern is that everyone is economically equal and each has their basic needs provided for by a central government.  The socialist mind-set believes that making people work for  basic needs such as housing, clothing, food, transportation, and health care is degrading to the workers.  They believe that businesses motivated by profit will always take advantage of labor by their selfish drive to make more and more money.  We will still own our own small businesses and still be able to acquire private property, but more and more, the government under Obama will nationalize the major corporations for the “good of society.”  With increasing frequency, we see the gradual erosion of private property ownership as local and federal government programs confiscate it for the “good of society.”  Large concentrations of wealth will no longer be tolerated which will result in the wealthy leaving America for better opportunities abroad.  That leaves Joe six-pack (me) living off the dole where the only legal jobs available are low-paying, mind-numbing government jobs.  Everyone but the ruling class will be living in government provided quarters.  Drugs and gangs will become even more desirable to young people seeking to express themselves.  I could go on painting a gloomy future, but I think you all understand that socialism leads inevitably to communism.

Communism:  Those of us old enough to have seen the “hippies” living in their pathetic little communes have a pretty good idea of what communism is all about.  In fact, communism goes back to the early Christian days.  It’s been tried many times and in many ways and it just doesn’t work because people are naturally self-serving.  And some are downright evil as we’ve seen with communism under Stalin and Mao.  To some, this pre-Stalin, pre-Mao form of communism seems an ideal way to live with all forms of production and all property being owned by the “community.”  And for those who have no ambitions other than to live their lives in peace and harmony every day, communism seems the perfect Utopia.  How sweet the siren’s call of “from each according to ability, to each according to need.”  The communist mind-set believes that private property (by the way, that includes money) and religion are the causes of all the evils of the world.  Today’s Marxist communists (of which many are college professors and politicians) see America and any other freedom loving peoples in the world as the chief cause of the problems of the world.  They must either be eradicated or transformed for the “good of society.”  If you want to know how wonderful communism is today, ask any Cuban who risked his/her life and limb getting into this country.

Marxism:  Conservatives believe that anyone who is anti-capitalist is a Marxist.  That’s not true. There are others who don’t agree with capitalism.  That would be your everyday garden variety long-haired hippy-type commie-pinko, and the tattooed, trinket-adorned (leave-no-external-organ-unpierced) weirdo.  It's the eggheads that teach our children who bother me.  Our children are being taught by the eggheads K-12 through Phd that Marxism is far superior to capitalism.  They are taught that capitalism deprives  human beings of their ability to be creative.  How anyone can swallow that hog-wash is beyond my understanding.  How creative was capitalism to be able to repeatedly put men on the moon?  No other form of government has ever done anything like that.  What other government had the wealth to accomplish such an astounding feat?  Our children are also taught that when they sell their labor, they turn their productive activity into a commodity, and in so doing they damage their self-esteem.  Furthermore, individualism (capitalism) prevents human beings from achieving their true nature (whatever the hell that means).   From the college textbook I mentioned earlier: “Marxism is a respected philosophical system.  And as a rigorous analysis and alternative to [conservative] capitalism is unmatched.” (Neopolitics, American Political Ideas in the 1980s, Linda J. Medcalf and Kenneth M. Dolbeare, Random House, 1985 p 205)

Fascism:  We all equate fascism with Nazi Germany and Mussolini’s Italy, but in modern times this view is passé.  Obama, in his usual demagogic manner, used fascist solutions to “aid” capitalism.  By nationalizing GM and Chrysler, two major automobile producers, Obama has, in his eyes, protected and maintained a major corporation.  This is the classic definition of fascism.  Allow me to quote from the same book I referenced above in speaking of fascism: “Managing the population includes rousing patriotic and nationalistic appeals, calls to sacrifice for the good of the nation.  It implies an adept use of symbols in order to manipulate a gullible, sheep like citizenry. (Remember the “Office of the President Elect” symbol he used during his campaign?)  Though the population may be engaged in the beginning, skillful manipulation of crises, economic and political, gradually leads to almost religious patriotic fervor.  Suppression of any dissent becomes increasingly oppressive, though still within procedural, legal limits.  Eventually, all necessary roads are taken to maintain the governing partnership.” [Between business and government] (p 206)  parenthesis and brackets are mine. Fascism allows small businesses to flourish but maintains control of production of the major corporations.  I have to admit that the definition I found in the textbook doesn’t quite match what Obama is doing.  The religious fervor isn’t for the nation, it’s for Obama himself.  I believe that was Hitler’s downfall at the end.

This is by no means all of the isms that exist today.  There is corporatism, anarchism, totalitarianism, conservatism, and capitalism to name the ones I didn’t cover.  There are some surprising things about these isms that I want to discuss in a future posting.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Letter to all Republican Senators

Today I wrote this letter and emailed it to 40] Senators.  Three were unavailable.  Wayne Allard, and John Sunnunu's terms were ended in January this year, and Richard Lugar does not accept emails from out of state Republicans?  I don't care what state these Senators represent, they represent all of America and I feel it is our duty to let them how we feel about issues important to us.  This is  the letter I sent:
 

I am a concerned citizen who is troubled by the nomination of judge Sotomayor to the Supreme Court of the United States.  I do not believe she is qualified as to judicial temperament nor as to her skill as an interpreter of the law (to wit: 60% reversals in the Supreme Court).  She represents a potential for divisiveness in the country at a time of chaos in both our economic and political lives.  I believe president Obama chose judge Sotomayor specifically for her propensity to favor a specified sector of society regardless of the merits of the case or the rights of those who are discriminated against (e.g. Ricci v DeStefano). It is also very troubling to discover the pains she went through to hide her decision so her colleagues would not discover it.

 

If we are to maintain our freedoms and liberties, we must have a judicial system peopled with honorable and intelligent people who will interpret the Constitution as the framers intended it to be read and who do not discriminate on the basis of skin color, economic circumstances, religious beliefs, sex, or sexual orientation, or any other modern day social designations.  The idea of a balanced and “representative” Supreme Court suggests that we are, in fact, a country of distinct groups based on ethnicity instead of One Country Under God.  If the judiciary is allowed to decide cases, on even one of these criteria, then it stands to reason all other ethnicities are, de facto, discriminated against. I am concerned that the blindfold of Justice will be ripped off and discarded.

 

I hear the arguments that her confirmation will not change the composition of the court.  And I understand there are no specific qualifications enumerated by the Founding Fathers regarding SCOTUS nominations.  Perhaps not, but common sense should still prevail.  I believe affirming Sotomayor will set a devastating precedence in future Supreme Court selections. 

 

I think she deserves her day in court, and I believe this vetting process will, in the end, prove to be a defining moment in our country.  It will, I believe, decide if we are hereafter going to be a country that yearns for justice for individuals through rule of law, or are we to be a country that seeks justice for individuals based on their affiliations through some flexible system of arbitrary laws based on empathy?

 

Who decides on what our status in life is?  By what system will we be judged?  We have already seen how so many new auto dealerships have been closed down while others remain open due to someone's empathetic and arbitrary decision.  Rumors abound they were closed down because they did not support the Obama campaign.  True or not, it's just another method that president Obama is using to divide and conquer our country.  I am, of course, referring to Abraham Lincoln's statement about a house divided that cannot stand.

 

I only ask that that you too use the scales of justice and keep the blindfold on.  Do not vote on the basis of race, color, social status, compelling personal stories, sex, or any other so-called qualifiers not related to good sound judicial choice.

 

Thank you for listening to my concerns.

 

Thank you for your service.

 

 

Lynn E. Carroll GyGst USMC Ret.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ruminations on the Obamanations

BLOG FOR MAY_29_09

 

In this, the age of noise, we are bombarded daily with images of, and are constantly forced to listen to, the praises of Obama.  I once went an entire month without watching TV, without listening to the radio, and without reading a newspaper.  I actually survived the ordeal quite well and the world did not destroy itself, the sky didn’t fall, and the Wall Street is still there.  In fact, out of curiosity, I monitored my blood pressure daily and I noticed it was down significantly.  But, of course, I couldn’t continue ignoring local and world events, because, you see, I’m a political news junkie.   Political news to me is what the Soaps are to others.   With soap operas you have a choice of two or three channels depending on your preferences, but with the news, no matter which news channel you select, it’s the same bland pap of Obama this and Obama that and how magnificent, intelligent, and forward –thinking he is.  At times it smacks of outright idolatry.  It sickens me.  Yet, like a deer in the headlights, I continue to watch.

Noting the mental illness aspect of this, I have observed that many who voted for Obama are still waiting for a different result.  “Give the man time.”  “Rome wasn’t built in a day.”  “He means well.”  These are typical phrases coming from friends and relatives who have gone over to the dark side.  They are still awaiting the “hope” and “change” they were promised by Obama.  When I ask them what hope or what change, I get that stunned by the headlights look, but no answer. 

Has anyone else noticed the absence of satirical humor concerning Obama in the Main Stream Media?  It’s like we are living in the Soviet Union and Stalin is dictating things.  Oh, there was plenty of underground humor in those bad old Cold War days, or so I’m told, but no one dared to publish or speak openly about the man unless it was in praise.  Why do I get that eerie feeling that we are reliving those days, but it’s in United States instead of the Union of Soviet Russia?  Instead of jokes being whispered in the backrooms and alleys of Moscow, we of the age of noise have the relative anonymity of the internet where you can find plenty of hilarity about the Bamster, for the time being.

I wonder how many Obamanites know the meaning of the terms “individualism” and “collectivism.”  Then I wonder how many of these same folks know the tremendous impact of the phrase “pursuit of happiness” found in the opening sentences of our Declaration of Independence.  While the Supreme Court has decided that the pursuit of happiness means, in some perverse, convoluted way, the right to abortions on demand, I for one, do not believe them.  One has to accept the premise that the pursuit of happiness is either an individual or a collective endeavor to further your station in life in a legal manner.  If you believe that we as individuals have the right to make as much out of our lives as we possibly can, to pursue wealth and luxury for ourselves and our families, then you are a Capitalist.  If, on the other hand, you believe that it is mean and selfish to look out for yourself, that individuals should not pursue wealth and prosperity because of the mistaken belief that it forces someone else to be poor and down-trodden, then you are a Socialist.

Those enamored of Obama may or may not see through his many disguises.  He can tell you out of one side of his mouth that he believes in all the values and morals of conservative America, while on the other side of mouth he is spouting socialism — about the value of government ownership and leadership in all aspects of your lives.  You should know this about Obama: he lies when he wants to appeal to your national pride.  Otherwise, he tells the truth when he talks about making changes in America.  It’s those “changes” that every freedom loving American should be very afraid of.

 If you believe in freedom and in yourself and in the power of your own intellect and ability to make your own way in this world, and you still believe Obama is the answer, you are in for a rude awakening.  If you believe that sacrificing yourself for the good of society will make a better world, then you are a deluded fool who thinks equality is the same as freedom and that mediocrity is ideal.  How dare you, Obama, think you can spend the yet unearned money of our future and punish us today with higher taxes to pay for it?  How dare you think that ignoring our Constitution, thumbing your nose at those who produce the real wealth and killing incentives for large and small business men and women is in any way honorable and deserving of the praise of decent and honest Americans?  How dare you take the world's finest system of medical care and socialize it into an inferior life-threatening abomination? How dare you create more taxes every day, yet tell us that you won't tax our income?  How long Lord, before this country gets its back up and throws him the hell out?

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Warning to all Americans!

 

It is apparent that Congress and our President and all his crooked cabinet folks believe that it is the rich who have caused and will continue to create more poverty in this country by virtue of the rich owing too much of the available money. This is a ludicrous idea at best, yet it is this thought that liberals base their economic theories on. They would have you believe that the economy is not a living thriving enterprise, but an inanimate, static thing like a pizza pie for instance. The pizza is finite and can only be split up in so many ways. If the rich have most of the slices, and those are large slices, then only a small portion is left for the rest of us. On its face this concept is utterly laughable, yet so-called intelligent and educated liberals seriously believe that in order to cure poverty is to confiscate the pizza then cut it into equal slices so that no one person gets more than the other.

The idea of the economy being something that can be equally divided among the people shows that ignorance about how a free market system works is alive and well among, not only the population in general, but its glaringly evident among our elected officials as well. The fact that most people do not understand a free market economy should not come as a surprise to anyone since this knowledge is purposely not taught in government schools. If it were, there would be little doubt in the minds of the public what a sham the government is perpetrating on them. It is infinitely easier to control an ignorant citizenry than an informed and educated one. 

For the last fifty years, maybe even more, our elementary, middle, and high schools have been the playground of liberal socialists. Our colleges and universities are producing scholars who have been steeped in Marxist theories of economics from kindergarten to the highest degrees of education. To expect America to turn around and understand the free market system in one or two elections is a pipe dream. We won’t wake up from this nightmare until we march in the streets, until we inundate our Representatives and Senators with letters of indignation and shame them into waking up to what is going on.

The recent peaceful Tea Party demonstrations caused the Homeland Security Czar, Janet Napolitano (little Napoleon) to create a supposedly secret document ("Right Wing Extremism:  Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.") defining Right Wing Extremists as domestic terrorists, then goes on to describe everyday Americans who took time from their jobs to protest Obama’s tax and spend policies as Extremists. Further, she warned that soldiers returning from the war zones should be watched closely lest they turn their knowledge of warfare on the government. This labeling of honest-to-God law-abiding Americans as terrorists, warning all levels of law enforcement officials to keep an eye on them, is a slap in the face to all of us. No such warning has been issued from her office about what might happen when the inmates at Guantanamo Bay are released within the next year. Not one word about Islam radicals and the Mosques and Madrassas in our own cities and neighborhoods actively teaching young boys and girls that all non-believers must convert or die.

To those active duty armed forces personnel and to all veterans, if you love your country, you will not be taken in by Obama’s recent and unexplained schmoozing of the military. Liberals hate the military and all it stands for except when it can be used to their advantage. He is up to something and I’m afraid, that in the paranoid state liberals are in today, he’s planning to use the military to discourage more large scale demonstrations against his policies. Go ahead, call me the paranoid one, but I’ve been preaching it would come to this for years. I’ve been sounding the warning that we are frogs in a pot of water that is gradually warming. No one listened so here we are, the water is about to come to a boil and people still aren’t listening.  

If you think it ends with Obama being voted out, you are sadly mistaken. Obama is not going to be voted out because there are too many of you who do not actively participate in your government. And even by some miracle, he is voted out, nothing much changes until you realize and make it be known on the Hill that this country does not belong to the government.  We are their masters, not the other way round. Once they control the economy, they control us.  Get off your asses and get involved before you find yourself part of a one-world government being ruled by people who don’t even speak your language.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT'S THE JOB "SAVED" COUNT?

 Every day, we hear the terrible news about job losses in the private sector, which after all the billions of dollars down a rat hole, are greater than ever today.  But, how come we never hear the good news about government jobs?  Those jobs are not only being "saved",  they are growing by leaps and bounds.  Of course -- and this is only my opinion -- the more people who work for the "boss",  the less resistance he is likely to encounter.  After all, their paychecks rely on his good graces.

Watch Hugo Chavez in Venezuela if you need a thermometer to see which dicrection this country is going to take in the future.  Especially, observe how they are succeeding in squelching the news media and talk show programs.  Obama's minions are taking their cues from Chavez to see how to proceed against such outspoken conservative luminaries as Rush Limbaugh.

Let's see if the full force of Obama's government can silence Limbaugh.  If they succeed, I'd be packing your bags if I were you!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A "NeoCon" strikes back

   Though George Washington did warn Congress against becoming entangled in foreign affairs, I'm certain he never envisioned the world as it exists today.  And though I myself have only scant knowledge about such matters, it is abundantly clear that whether we like it or not, we are embroiled in the affairs of the world.

   The only question we as a country must address is this:  Are we going to present a united front against those who would destroy us or are we going to become, as Lincoln feared,  a house divided falling, falling apart like a deck of cards?  Today the 'house' is in the process of falling.  In doubt?  Look at the process of multiculturalism going on right under our noses.  What a nice, fuzzy, warm sounding word--multiculturalism.  What it really means is that each culture is separate in the manner of the European nation-states.  No more melting pot, no more Americanism.  America's birth;  our struggle and achievements to become the most powerful, the most enlightened country on earth are given short shrift by multiculturalist educators.  We are becoming a nation of individual cards, each with their own agenda.  In this manner liberalism will accomplish at least one of its goals.  To divide and conquer.

   I am sick and tired of being called a Neo-Con by ignorant, uninformed, brain-dead young liberals whose communist agenda fits right into Osama Bin Laden's plan to bring America down; to destroy us as a civilization.  It takes a moron to use an oxymoron (New Conservative) to describe someone who doesn't believe in their liberal ideology, or more correctly, their religion.  There is no "new" conservatism, because it's the same as it was in 1775 when we declared our independence from the English King.  If you listen closely to today's liberals, then listen to Bin Laden's plans for us, you will see the parallels in their agendas.  If being a Neo-Con means that I believe our country is deep into a vicious struggle for survival from at least two sides (The Fascism of radical Islam and the Communism of today's liberals), then yes, I am a Neo-Con.  We fight not only for ourselves, for if we fail, the entire world will be subjected to a new and terrible Dark Age from which we may never overcome.  The fact is, no one really knows what a Neo-Con is.  It is a made-up word copied from the word Neo-Nazi, meant to stigmatize conservatives as Nazis. 

   The problem with that is, it is liberalism that most resembles the Nazi government of Hitler's Germany.  It is the liberals who are intolerant of anyone who doesn't see them as the new world order.  It is liberals who desire government control of medical care, transportation, housing, education, etc.  on a national level.  You see, Nazism is German for Nationalism.  Unlike Communism, Nazi fascists do not desire to own big corporations, only to control them.  They believe that they know what is best for business and the people.  They hate the free market system of Capitalism because it means that they are not in control of the country and its people.  Liberals believe that people are not intelligent enough to have freedom and liberty, so these things must be limited in order to maintain their control of society.

   To live in the world of today's liberal mind is to slap on a set of blinders that will shield you from realism, and channel your vision to a Utopian world of peace at any cost.  In Utopia, you have no decisions to make, the government makes them for you.  In order to achieve this lofty idealistic goal you believe that no matter how irrational and illogical the argument, if it furthers the cause, it is good.  When I hear, "Bush stole the election." I know  there is not one shred of truth to that statement, yet, because repeating the lie disrupts the election process and creates disharmony among the people, it is taken as gospel by many of our government educated youth, the product of a failed nationalized education system.  They've been brainwashed into believing that America is too rich, too powerful, and too arrogant.  Liberal educators have fed our youth a steady diet of socialist propaganda to the point that they are so besotted with liberalism they cannot make a logical decision on their own.

   No matter how vicious and barbaric the enemy, liberals naively believe they can have a 'dialogue' with them (unless of course, their enemy happens to be conservatives, George Bush or the evil "corporate giants."  What blatant hypocrisy!)  You liberals believe you can persuade these sociopaths called Muslim Jehadists with logic and understanding.  If that doesn't work, to save yourselves, you will placate them  with train-car-loads of money and material things straight from the pockets of the evil rich that you detest.  War to you is immoral, a situation to be avoided at all costs including not only your freedoms and liberties, but  those of the rest of the industrial nations as well.  You will gladly drag us all down into your self-made pit of surrender and abject indignity. 

   It is imperative for liberals to bring down the evil "corporate giants" and the evil Christian-infested government of George Bush.  Straight out of the Communist Manifesto and the writings of Marx; the evil greedy rich people of the world must be brought down to the level of the masses.  There must be an equality of outcome, equality of income, equality of health care and of housing.  The public must have free transportation, free food.  We must have Utopia at all costs.  And in accordance with Gramsci's (another socialist), Theory of Hegemony, the liberals have infiltrated the traditional institutions that once made our country great.  Education at all levels, health care, the entertainment industry (which now includes the news media), and government, especially the Judicial Branch, and yes, even the Pentagon.  Creeping liberalism is in the process of taking over Congress and unless we shine the light on these insidious activities and stop this nonsense, we are going to lose our beloved country.

   When I hear the drivel of young liberals today parroting words like:  "Bush lied, people died."  I can only shake my head in sorrow.  No, you thick-headed cretins, Bin Laden brought down the Twin Towers, attacked the Pentagon, and caused the crash of Flight 93, and innocent people died.  The fact that Bush used every avenue available to him for over six months to placate Saddam Hussein, then clearly gave him an ultimatum to no avail means nothing to liberals.  The fact that all but one or two individuals in the U.S. Congress and the UN believed he had weapons of mass destruction, that he had used them on his own people, that he was supporting the families of suicide bombers, and that he would most likely be the one to provide these weapons to more people just like those who brought such terrible destruction to New York City--those particular facts mean nothing to today's young liberals.  They only know, "Bush lied, people died."  When they hear their mantras, like Pavlov's dogs, they react without thinking.  No conscious effort to establish the facts, just an irrational belief in empty platitudes and mottoes. 

   Today we have two factions in this country.  The conservatives that liberals love to call neo-cons, and the liberals.  (Notice, they don't call themselves neo-libs.)  The mutual respect the two had until Roosevelt's socialism "rescued" the country...the respect that made this country great, has died.  Today, the republicans and democrats are in a mighty struggle for the control of the hearts and minds of the American people.  One party stands for justice and liberty for all, the other means to wrest control of the government from the people by any means necessary.  They will never give up that dream.  I mourn for my country.

   I am afraid for my country because todays liberals, these ignorant, easily led, pseudo-intellectual numbskulls, who have no stake in the continuing prosperity and freedom of America, whose only real interest is a life of government-provided benefits assuring their ease and comfort, without the effort to attain it...I'm scared because these people get to vote in our local and national elections.  I am a conservative American and  I believe in the rights of the individual so I cannot lawfully stop them, nor do I intend to forcefully impede their rights.  I can only stand by helplessly as they bring the greatest nation ever to exist in the history of mankind to its knees.

       

 

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jimmy Carter is Typical Liberal AirHead.

Rather than think about the problem in a logical manner, he believes his feelings are all that matters.  If it makes him feel good to talk to the devil himself, he'll do it without thinking of the consequences.  He is living proof that liberalism is a mental disorder.  He continues to believe that Hamas will be honorable and willing to negotiate in an honest and forthright manner, even though they have demonstrated time and again they have no such intentions.  This is the classic definition of insanity.

 

These people understand that Carter is nothing more than a useful idiot and are using him like a rented mule.  The distressing part of all this --- there are people out there who actually believe Carter is a wise man who can bring peace to the world.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  He is encouraging these animals to continue to fight because they see America as weak so long as we can be tricked into negotiating.  They must be beaten in battle and they must be forced to cry UNCLE!  That is how we gain their respect and obedience.  Anything else is whistling past the graveyard.

 

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »